Voluntary disarmament will generally be possible only after a government has proven that it is able to protect the security of the people to be disarmed. Second, forcible attempts to disarm people who still need guns to defend themselves—including for protection from predatory governments—are likely to lead to massive resistance, and to an escalating cycle of human rights abuses by government forces, and finally, to re-armament by the victim population.
How about Free? I will submit to no man or woman and will not give up the one thing that will keep it that way…My firearms…If owning a ‘tool’ becomes illegal, it will only be because we have a Government which wishes total control..Again I refuse to submit!!!
The media again displayed their lack of reporting facts and truth. Leaping up and down squealing about the ‘bad’ AR15..
Proving again how unreliable and biased today’s New is from the Lamestream media.
The answer to this question is yes!!
No one can protect you if someone is intent on harming you. What recourse would one have when a government begins to strip your God given Rights away if you are disarmed? If a government controlled by those whom want to impose their will upon you?
What can you do if disarmed and helpless? Not much and it seems today’s LIEberals and their politicians want nothing better then to dictate our lives..
Another fine example of the lying leftist controlled lying media…
Well this would work about as well as banning guns, oh wait, Chicago has already tried that!! And it didn’t work now did it?
MAYBE CHICAGO SHOULD BAN GANGS, NOT GUNS, SAYS CCRKBA
BELLEVUE, WA – A call for banning so-called “assault weapons” in the wake of Thursday night’s shooting in a Chicago park, believed to be part of an ongoing war between two rival gangs, shows the Windy City needs to concentrate on banning gangs, not guns, the Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms said today.
Police Supt. Garry McCarthy was quoted by Chicago reporters insisting that the shooting, which seriously wounded a 3-year-old boy, is ample proof that “assault weapons” should be banned.
But when the Chicago Tribune noted that police think the shooting was the latest episode of violence between the Gangster Disciples and the Black P. Stones, CCRKBA Chairman Alan Gottlieb said this puts the real problem in perspective.
“When you have street thugs opening fire on groups of people in a gang war,” he observed, “that suggests the city has not advanced much since the days of Al Capone and Bugs Moran. Law-abiding Chicago residents continue to face bureaucratic obstacles, wade through red tape and jump through hoops before they can legally own a gun, while criminals obviously don’t bother with any of that, and just drive around shooting people.
“If Superintendent McCarthy and his boss, Mayor Rahm Emanuel, want to make the streets safer,” he continued, “they should concentrate their efforts on ridding the city of its criminal element rather than push for bans on the kinds of firearms that are owned by millions of law-abiding Americans. Those citizens haven’t hurt anyone, and neither have their guns.
“McCarthy and his department could pull a little ‘Shock and Awe’ operation, one neighborhood at a time, rousting these thugs, arresting those who have outstanding warrants, jailing those found to be illegally carrying guns and sending a message to straighten up or you’re going down,” Gottlieb suggested. “It’s time for Chicago authorities to face the fact that they’re not going to get rid of their crime problem until they start getting rid of their criminals.”
No Free Speech, no speaking out against what the establishment, accept and be quiet!! No discussion, no forum. Police State has arrived