What Do Those Gun Grabbers in Minnesota’s House of Representatives Do…

For ‘real’ work?
Stolen here..

After my post on gun control legislation in Minnesota and its impact on jobs in that state, I started looking at the legislators who were sponsoring this legislation. Other than the fact that they were all Democrats, or as they are called in Minnesota – Democrat-Farmer-Labor, they had another similarity. They had made their careers, for the most part, in the public sector. Some, like Rep. Alice Hausman and Rep. Phyllis Kahn, even listed their occupation as “Legislator”. Look at the list below of the sponsors of HF 241 which is Minnesota’s version of an assault weapons (sic) ban.

Rep. Alice Hausman (DFL-St. Paul) Legislator/fmr Teacher
Rep. Frank Horstein (DFL-Minneapolis) Community Organizer
Rep. Erik Simonson (DFL-Duluth) Asst Fire Chief
Rep. Jim Davnie (DFL-Minneapolis) Financial Educator
Rep. Linda Slocum (DFL-Richfield) Teacher
Rep. Rena Moran (DFL-St. Paul) Parent Leader Coord.
Rep. Raymond Dehn (DFL-Minneapolis) Sustainability Consultant
Rep. JoAnn Ward (DFL-Woodbury) Retired Teacher
Rep. Phyllis Kahn (DFL-Minneapolis) Legislator/University Research Assoc.

This made me wonder if the sponsors of gun control legislation in other states shared the similar characteristics of being primary from the public sector. With hearings on gun control legislation in Colorado and New Jersey scheduled for this week, I looked at those two states in particular.

Letter..Sent..

To:
The Governor of MN
The MN State Senate
The MN State House
To the Honorable Alice Hausman, Frank Hornstein, Erik Simonson, Jim Davnie, and Linda Slocum:
Please do not support HF241, the new Minnesota assault weapons ban that you co-authored.
This bill, although based on good intentions as a step on the road to reduce gun violence, is not based on evidence of the impact of semiautomatic military style assault weapons in Minnesota crime, and does not represent the will of the people.
Those that sign this petition want to see their lawmakers have an open, honest discussion on the true issues surrounding gun violence, including: a lack of better education on gun safety for all gun owners; inconsistent prosecution of those who falsify background check documents; gang-related activity; and other factors that make it easy for people to get access to guns they are ineligible to purchase.
Additionally, this bill submits private, law-abiding citizen to a new set of strict regulations on their legally owned semiautomatic firearms banned under this legislation. Minnesotans already follow the policies surrounding purchase of a so-named “military style assault weapon” and handguns by getting the proper permits, undergoing a background check, and showing a valid ID.
The new bill would require yearly re-registration, background checks, limit the magazine capacity of these firearms, deny the right of a person to gift or will a firearm to a loved one or close friend, and ultimately ends in the state obtaining these firearms upon submission or death of the owner, to be permanently destroyed.

With all respect, we, the people of Minnesota, do not support this legislation, and we urge you to remove your support as well.

Sincerely,
[Your name]