Tag Archives: Rachel Maddow

Crackers..MadCow..BigGov..Heckling..Hail…No breakfast!!..Communists..

Crazy crackers on the Right..

That is coming from a screeching harlot on the left…Makes sense…Not..

___

Some folks whom are so anti gun and so want us to give them up and become submissive sheeple and follow the progressives every whim, into oblivion should, no needs to watch this video..

Chinese-American Gun Owner Who Was at Tiananmen Square Speaks Against Gun Control

___

Another screeching liberal harlot getting what she deserves. Not enough. But it is a start!! Madcow disease….

See MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow get served with lawsuit

___

Big government programs that failed?

Yeah..totally not unexpected..

Just saying..

___

Who was heckling who??

___

Hailstorm??? Hell on Earth!!

Hailstones the size of boulders have rained down on villages in southern India. At least nine people were killed when the violent weather hit several villages in the state of Andhra Pradesh. The hailstorm which lasted for almost 20 minutes, destroyed crops, houses and live stock, causing devastating financial implications for residents. It was once-in-lifetime experience for people living in seven villages in Chevella, Moinabad and Shankarpally. The hailstones started falling from the sky on Tuesday night and covered the entire villages under the snow-like blanket. Some women were seen attempting to sweep up the massive boulders using flimsy brushes more suited to lighter debris. Dr K. Sitarama, director, Meteorological Centre Hyderabad, said: 'The hailstorm was caused by an intense thunderstorm. 'Such occurances are highly localised and restricted to a small area.' The storm in the south was extremely rare as the deadliest hailstorms, and perhaps the largest hailstones, in the world occur on the Deccan Plateau of northern India and in Bangladesh.

___

As a medic large scale events always interest me and for about a dozen years or so the Service I worked for had a few events, one, held yearly, which over the course of a 4 day period could bring in well over a 100, 000 people, to a town of 15,000. We staged additional medics on bikes, gators, additional ‘truck’, and an aid tent downtown. I always enjoyed it and although it got busy we never had any ‘disasters’.

But the Super Bowl, Mardi Gras, with the  usual load New Orleans has..well this would be a large scale event!!

___

Obamacare…Just keeps getting worse..

Feds adding Obamacare to immigrant welcome packets…

___

Nothing like a good hearty breakfast to start the day off. Especially when off serving the Country fighting terror..But wait??

Apparently Buck Ofama does not agree..Showing his disdain for those whom serve and he expects cooperation from them…Shit.

“These men and women put their lives on the line every day to protect the very freedoms we cherish. The exhaustive mental and physical labor that is required by soldiers to fight in harsh and unforgiving conditions is tremendous. We shouldn’t deny our troops something as fundamental as a proper meal.

___

Buck Ofama was ‘endorsed’ by the Commie Party…Some of their goals..

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

___

Liberal Dumbassery

Reaches a new level here!

I am NOT a O’Reilly fan. He is to damn full of himself and I bet he spends way to much time telling himself how great he is. Cripes he like so many other so called JournOlists can’t see past their damn ego!

Television sucks by the way. Pretty much all of it! As does most of Talk Radio.

But Rachel MadCow? Come on! She is the epitome of intolerance on the left! She is so damn hate filled and spews more hate and crap then anyone on Fox!

Shit she is right next to “Pissin on my Leg” Matthews and Oblabberman and they are even seeing the dim bulb that is Obama for what he is!

Like I said dude reached for the dumbassery award!

I own ME, You own YOU!

From Political Correctness Watch!

There are some good points here and I agree that the Governement has no right to force a damn thing on me and these commentors like Rachet Madsow should shut the hell up!! Along with the fact I do not owe you a damn thing!

In defense of bigots

This may come as a shock to collectivists, but narrow-minded, prejudiced, rude, stupid bigots have the same rights as everyone else.

The recent television discussion between Rand Paul (son of Ron Paul) and Rachel Maddow (collectivist propagandist) has gotten a lot of attention, and has prompted a flood of comments from people who don’t know how to think. Personally, I think Rand deserves some criticism for his comments … for being too civil and too “moderate” with the state-violence-worshiping hostess. To the question of whether a restaurant owner has the right to have a “No blacks allowed” policy, the principled answer would have been, unapologetically and unconditionally:

“Yes, a restaurant owner has the absolute right to serve and not serve whomever he damn well pleases, for any reason or no reason at all. An owner can say ‘No blacks allowed,’ or ‘No whites allowed,’ or ‘Only atheist albino midgets allowed.’ It’s his damn property, and no one–not you, not me, and not any collective or any ‘government’–has the right to initiate violence to FORCE him to do whatever WE think would be the polite, fair, noble thing.”

It’s bizarre how statists–those who advocate that the violence of
“government” be used to fix every “unfairness” they see (or imagine)–are the ones who most often claim to be “tolerant.” To “tolerate” something doesn’t mean to approve of something, or to support it–it only means to let it exist. Therefore, the bigot who chooses not to deal with his money, or on his property, with a particular racial or religious group, but who doesn’t go onto their property to harass or attack them, is being 100% tolerant of them. On the other hand, Rachel Maddow, and millions of other well-indoctrinated collectivist Americans, who seek to have “government” forcibly impose their version of “fairness” on the bigot, are being completely intolerant. Ironically, they feel good about it, and consider themselves compassionate and morally superior for wanting to introduce violence into the situation, via “legal” coercion.

I wonder what Comrade Maddow would think if the Department of Fairness determined that she was spending too much of her money at white-owned businesses, and commanded her to change her evil ways. Would she suddenly recognize the principle involved here? How about if the Fairness Fascists told Black Entertainment Television (BET), or the NAACP, that they were required to hire more whites, and were commanded to stop trying to target their services towards one particular racial group?

The principle is not complicated: You get to decide who you will associate with and trade with, and I get to decide who I will associate and trade with. And yes, some people–quite a few, in fact–will make choices that you or I would find stupid, or even offensive. You have the right to not patronize businesses you don’t approve of. You have the right to publicly criticize their practices. You have the right to encourage other people to boycott such businesses. But you do not have the right to choose what is to be done with someone else’s property. The notion that the collective has some right to forcibly impose its beliefs on every individual is infinitely more destructive than letting people be stupid with their own property.

Exactly what threat is posed to society by some racist dude who won’t let people of another race onto his property? Damn near none. (And how many customers do you think the guy would get anyway?) His choices of who to associate with, and who to trade with, are his–and his alone–to make. That is true of everyone, of all races and religions.

In contrast, an enormous threat is posed to society by people thinking that they have the right, via “government” mercenaries, to force people into associations and trades those people don’t want to make. You can call it “affirmative action,” or “anti-discrimination laws,” or some other euphemisms that make you feel better about it, but what you are advocating is adding violence into a situation to try to achieve whatever you deem to be “fair.” And if you think that using the state to force people to deal with each other is going to lead to peace, love and harmony, you’re a bonehead. Do you really think the KKK guy with the “government” gun pointed at his head is suddenly going to start loving black people? Of course not. Getting “government” mercenaries involved will only exacerbate the problem.

And don’t think the tyrants don’t know this. What those in “government” have done in the name of improving “race relations” was designed to forever divide the races, and to keep both sides forever begging “government” for its blessings and preferential treatment. The result is perpetual strife among the citizenry, and increased power for politicians.

Keep in mind, slavery lasted as long as it did only because it was sanctioned by “government.” How long do you think slavery would have lasted if there was not a national network of “law enforcement” using violence against those who attempted to free slaves? And the Jim Crow “laws” were edicts from the tyrants, forcing business-owners to discriminate. Remember the Rosa Parks incident? It was the result of a “law” mandating racial segregation on busses.

Now, do you really think that the establishment Democrat party which pushed for those segregation and other racist “legislation” suddenly grew a conscience when the “civil rights movement” expanded? No, they just found a new way to control and subjugate people, black and white. The racist, divisive, oppressive “Jim Crow” type policies were replaced by racist, divisive, oppressive “civil rights” legislation. (Heck, they didn’t even always change the faces. Try doing an internet search for Robert Byrd–U.S. Senator and former KKK big-wig–and the term “race mongrels,” and see if you still believe that the Democrat party establishment has the best interests of black folk at heart.)

(As an aside, I find it very impressive that way back in 1865, Frederick Douglass, a former slave, could already see that “government” efforts to “help” the freed slaves was a really bad idea, and that the best thing the politicians could do was nothing. Regarding the politicians’ “attempt to prop up the Negro,” Douglass implored them to simply “Let him alone,” and “Let him fall if he cannot stand alone!”)

In short, if you want to be tolerant, open-minded, compassionate, and peacefully coexist with people of all colors, creeds, etc., then you need to recognize that “government” is always the enemy, even when it pretends to offer “help.” It will always try to pit you against some other group, and will always try to use differences (or make differences) in order to increase its own power. It will always add threats and coercion to the situation–that’s all it ever does, and all it can do (that’s all “law” is)–and that is not the way to achieve harmony, justice, or fairness.

“Government” is the enemy of blacks, the enemy of whites, the enemy of humanity. But as long as the people keep falling for the tyrant tricks–as long as we keep crying to the control freaks in “government” to forcibly impose our preferences and beliefs on everyone else–then human society will be nothing but a cage full of squabbling brats, all whining for the jailer to whip the other prisoners harder (which is pretty much what every election is).

The other choice–and I realize this is pretty darn radical–is to accept the fact that …. I OWN ME, and YOU OWN YOU.

SOURCE