Tag Archives: Republicans

Tell Your Senators to Say NO to the Anti-Gun Funding Bill!

“GOA [has] stood alone among national gun rights groups …” — The Examiner, December 11, 2014

“Gun Owners of America (GOA) says Republicans should vote against a trillion-dollar government funding package Thursday afternoon … because it would also provide more than $1 billion in support for “Barack Obama’s anti-gun executive actions.” — The Hill, December 11, 2014


Not a GOA member yet?  Make sure to join Gun Owners of America!


ACTION: Defeating the anti-gun funding bill in the Senate is, admittedly, a “hail Mary” pass.  But it is one worth throwing. Contact your Senators and ask that they vote against the “Cromnibus.” (You can also call them at 202-224-3121.)

PRO-GUN CONSERVATIVES COME JUST SHORT OF THWARTING BOEHNER

You’ve probably heard the news already regarding the corrupt anti-gun government funding bill which passed late last night.

In the end, even liberal Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) balked about supporting the bill, known as the Cromnibus.

But Boehner was aided by Barack Obama and Joe Biden, who worked the phone tirelessly Thursday, giddy at the prospect that Boehner would agree to fund Obama’s illegal executive actions on gun control, immigration and the anti-gun ObamaCare.

In the end, the Boehner-Obama-Biden team was able to pass the giant $1.1 trillion anti-gun bill by a vote of 219-206.  And 162 House Republicans who campaigned by opposing gun control, ObamaCare, and immigration amnesty dutifully voted to fund all three.

Notably, there were 67 Republicans who voted against the anti-gun Cromnibus — and they voted NO for the right reasons. You can see how all Representatives vote d here.

Now, the bill goes to the Senate, where it will be voted on sometime in the next few days, depending on the resolve of opponents on the Right like Ted Cruz and Rand Paul — and, ironically, opponents on the Left like Elizabeth Warren who have their own problems with the bill.

SEVERAL ANTI-GUN PROVISIONS

Those of you who have been following our website and/or Facebook will have already seen our analysis of the Cromnibus.

As a matter of process, this gigantic bill was hatched in secret and sprung on the American people less than the 72 hours before consideration, which was promised by Republicans when they asked us to elect them.  This is precisely what the GOP said it would not do if we gave their party control of Congress.

As a matter of substance, the bill spends hundreds of millions of dollars to fund Barack Obama’s illegal executive actions on guns. Consider what it does:

(1) It “fights gun violence” with $1.1 billion — an increase of $53 million.  We all know this is a euphemism for gun control, and there is nothing which prevents the administration from using this money to support its anti-gun “executive action” agenda.

(2) The bill increases funds, by $13 million, for the widely abused NICS system which Obama has spent the last two years trying to expand — both through unsuccessful legislation and then through unlawful executive action.

Among the people stripped of their Second Amendment rights by the bill’s largesse will be over 175,000 law-abiding veterans.  The bill is, thus, a kick in the pants to those who served our country honorably and are counting on you to protect them.

(3) The bill rewards the ATF for its illegal Fast and Furious program with an extra $22 million. Eric Holder has thumbed his nose at Congress with respect to any accountability for this outrageous abuse, and yet the drafters have no problem rewarding him for his contempt of (and for) Congress.

(4) The bill also provides $73 million for states like New York to impose gun bans when psychiatrists, as a result of its anti-gun “SAFE” Act, are forced by state law to report their patients, based on subjective determinations with no real due process.  Tens of thousands of people may experience unconstitutional gun bans in New York alone, thanks to this bill.

(5) Moreover, the bill provides $3 million to encourage Americans to lock up their safety with trigger locks, so that their guns will not be available in connection with a burglary or armed home invasion.

(6) Finally, as noted above, the bill fully funds the anti-gun ObamaCare law (which threatens the privacy of millions of gun owners) and the President’s illegal executive amnesty (which begins a process of legalizing millions of new anti-gun voters).

Sure, the bill carries forward both pro- and anti-gun boilerplate from previous years.

But the drafters put their money where their mouth is.  And that is in support of Obama’s unconstitutional “executive action” gun control.

PRO-GUN HEROES WHO NARROWLY MISSED TORPEDOING THE BILL

Pro-gun conservatives in the House came super close to derailing the Cromnibus on an earlier, parliamentary vote.  This is a vote which determines, among other things, whether any amendments will be allowed on the House floor during consideration of a particular bill.

Democrats typically vote in lock-step against the “rules vote,” and Republicans typically vote in unison in favor of the rule.

But 16 Republican heroes broke ranks, in an attempt to defeat the rule and derail the bill.  In fact, so many Republicans broke ranks that our side was temporarily winning until two Republican Congressmen defected by switching their votes at the last second, giving Boehner a razor thin 216-214 majority.

Nevertheless, these 16 Republican defectors should be thanked for their bravery.  They were Reps. Justin Amash (Mich.), Michele Bachmann (Minn.), Dave Brat (Va.), Mo Brooks (Ala.), Paul Broun (Ga.), Louie Gohmert (Texas), Paul Gosar (Ariz.), Tim Huelskamp (Kan.), Walter Jones (N.C.), Jim Jordan (Ohio), Steve King (Iowa), Raúl Labrador (Idaho), Thomas Massie (Ky.), Bill Posey (Fla.), Matt Salmon (Ariz.) and Steve Stockman (Texas).

THE FIGHT NOW GOES TO THE SENATE

There is still one more battle, as the action now goes to the Senate.

To defeat the bill in the Democrat-controlled Senate will presumably require only 41 votes because of the ability of Senators to filibuster. While, admittedly, it is a “hail Mary” pass, it is one worth throwing.

ACTION:  Contact your Senators.  Ask them to vote against the anti-gun government funding bill, both on cloture and on final passage (which will probably consist of a vote on concurring with the House amendment).

NOTE: This alert contains different messages for Republican and Democrat Representatives. By using the GOA Engage site to contact your Representative, the system will automatically select the correct letter.

Republican Leadership Prepared to Relinquish all (Gun) Policy Decisions to Democrats…

 … for the Next Ten Months!


Not a GOA member yet?  Make sure to join Gun Owners of America!


First, the good news.  Last week, you contacted your congressional representatives and demanded a “short term” Continuing Resolution.  They heard you, and every conservative in Washington is echoing this theme.

Now for the bad news.  Even though Republicans just won control of Congress, what’s the first “bright idea” the Republican leadership comes up with after their wave election?

ANSWER: GIVE CONGRESSIONAL DEMOCRATS CONTROL OF THE CONGRESS FOR THE NEXT TEN MONTHS!!!!!   

Thankfully, the overwhelming percentage of conservative Republicans in Washington are opposed to this.  And that’s why we need to keep lighting the fire under them, so they will continue to keep pressing their leadership to stand up to Harry Reid and Barack Obama.

Here is what’s at stake: Virtually all spending and policy decisions are made on the giant government-funding bill, called the “continuing resolution” or “CR.”

And it’s in the “CR” where we have been able to defund much of Obama’s anti-gun agenda:  defunding the shotgun import ban, Fast & Furious, the implementation of the Arms Trade Treaty, etc.

The current “CR” is slated to expire on December 11. So the Republican House has two choices:

1. It can allow the repudiated Democrats currently in control of the Senate (until January 5) to make all of the spending and policy decisions — which will affect your gun rights — until September 30, 2015. It would do this by passing a so-called “long-term CR” which would set policy and spending until the end of the fiscal year (September 30, 2015).

2. Or it would do a “short-term CR” into January, February, or March. This would allow the newly elected Republican Congress to set spending and policy for the federal government for most of next year.

What difference does it make?

Given Obama’s “veto pen,” all of the pro-gun policy for the next two years will probably be achieved on this bill — or not.

When April 15 hits — and millions of Americans are hit with hundreds of dollars of ObamaFines — we may be able to create a massive fight over ObamaCare’s unconstitutional mandates.

And this could be the best chance that gun owners have of eliminating a backdoor gun ban — where health data is compiled on millions of Americans and used to disarm gun owners (similar to how 175,000 military veterans have already been disarmed).

But we can’t do it without a short-term CR.

Finally, with respect to the anti-gun amnesty provisions Obama is about to illegally promulgate by executive fiat? We can address these in a Republican controlled Congress. But we can’t, so long as Harry Reid is in the catbird’s seat.

So we ask this of Republicans: Why did we elect you? It certainly wasn’t so that you could cede all of the spending and policy decisions to Democrats for 37.5% of your congressional term.

It’s time to show some backbone. And the first step is a short-term CR.

ACTION:  Contact your Representative and urge him to insist on a “short-term CR.”

Media BiASS: Not News, Brown Nosing, Butt Licking, Leftist Babbling…

CBS’s Schieffer Empathizes with Obama: Did You Ever Say ‘Are We Ever Going to Get a Break?’

 

In his pre-recorded Face the Nation sit-down with President Barack Obama, CBS’s Bob Schieffer asked about putting more troops into Iraq, fighting ISIS, giving Congress a chance to act first on immigration and whether Democratic election losses were his fault, but he also devoted several questions to empathizing with Obama, as if Obama were a victim of circumstance and not responsible for failures or making situations worse: “You had a tough summer. We saw the rise of ISIS, the outbreak of Ebola, trouble in the Ukraine, illegal immigrants coming across the border, did you ever go back to the residence at night and say, ‘are we ever going to get a break here?’”

 

Halperin on ABC: GOP Must Take Risk and Confront Their Base

 

Appearing on ABC’s This Week w/ George Stephanopoulos on Sunday, Mark Halperin co-host of With All Due Respect on Bloomberg, pressed the GOP to take “take some risks” after winning control of the Senate during this year’s midterm elections. Speaking during a panel discussion, Halperin argued that the GOP runs the risk “standing up to the Tea Party caucus and talk radio” but that they must take risks “if they want to do what’s good for their politics and good for the country.”

 

CNN’s Lemon: ‘Why Do People Vote Against Their Own Interests’ With ObamaCare?

 

CNN’s Don Lemon, Chris Cuomo, and Alisyn Camerota stuck to the left’s spin about the results of the 2014 midterm elections on Thursday’s CNN Tonight, as they discussed President Obama’s Wednesday press conference. Lemon wondered, “Why do people vote against their own interests? Because if you look at West Virginia, Kentucky, Arkansas…they put mostly Republicans in office…But they are the states that are benefiting the most from the Affordable Care Act.”

 

NBC: ‘Republicans Have Drawn Their Own Battle Lines’ By ‘Doubling Down’ On ObamaCare Repeal

 

In a report for Thursday’s NBC Today, White House correspondent Kristen Welker continued the network’s effort to preemptively blame Republicans for any gridlock that may occur in Washington following the GOP’s landslide win in Tuesday’s midterm election: “Republicans have drawn their own battle lines, doubling down on their pledge to repeal the President’s signature piece of legislation, ObamaCare, and vowing to approve the Keystone Pipeline, which the President has resisted.” Introducing the segment, fill-in co-host Willie Geist noted congressional leaders meeting with President Obama at the White House on Friday and wondered: “But can a lunch really do anything to break the long-standing gridlock in Washington?”

 

Nets Predicted Republican Doom With Hispanics, Yawn at GOP Surge

 

For years, liberal journalists have been predicting Republican doom with Hispanics, declaring that rage from the growing ethnic population would result in a permanent GOP minority. NBC’s Matt Lauer, for instance, wondered if the severe “damage” could be repaired. Yet, the Republican landslide on Tuesday was powered, in part, by a strong showing with Latinos. So far, this has been ignored by ABC, CBS and NBC.

 

IRS Admits They Never Looked for Lerner’s Missing Emails, Networks Skip Revelation

 

On November 5, Judicial Watch announced that the IRS admitted “that it failed to search any of the IRS standard computer systems for the ‘missing’ emails of Lois Lerner and other IRS officials.” So how many Big Three (ABC, CBS, NBC) network stories have been dedicated to this latest revelation in the IRS scandal? 0.

 

CNN Hypes Laugh Similarity Between Joni Ernst and Disney Villain

 

On Friday’s CNN Newsroom, Brooke Baldwin played up the apparent similarity between Senator-elect Joni Ernst’s laugh and that of Cruella De Vil, the antagonist from Disney’s 101 Dalmations. Baldwin aired a short segment on Ernst and two newly-elected Republican women in Congress. She ended the part about the Iowa politician with her comparison: “Don’t forget about that laugh. Some people call it contagious; other people have likened it to this.” The anchor then twice played clips of Ernst laughing at her victory rally, followed by De Vil’s evil cackle.

Media BiASS: Leftist Media in Hysterics and Denial!! GOOD!!

Denial: Tom Brokaw Claims No ‘Big, Ideological’ Win for GOP

 

Despite the Republicans dramatically retaking the Senate, increasing their majority in the House and upping the number of GOP governors, veteran NBC journalist Tom Brokaw on Tuesday night insisted, “I don’t think that this was a big, ideological election, as much as it was ‘we want to change the team.'” The ex-NBC Nightly News anchor put the responsibility on Republicans: “Will [voters] fall out of love with Republicans that they have elected to office? That all depends on how the Republicans take control of the Senate now and the Congress.” Sounding a bit cranky, Brokaw continued, “Does [Mitch] McConnell back away from repealing, for example, Affordable Care? Will we not hear about Benghazi again for a while and all the other issues that have been coming up?”

 

Andrea Mitchell Slams ‘Scary,’ ‘Non-Factual’ GOP Ads

 

Appearing on MSNBC, Tuesday night, for election returns, anchor Andrea Mitchell angrily denounced Republican ads on Ebola as “scary” and “non-factual.” Hardball host Chris Matthews lamented that ISIS terror attacks had dropped off as an election issue: “How did that cease to be an election issue?” This prompted Mitchell to blast Republicans for their Ebola ads: “But it’s not a substantive argument. It’s a scare tactic…by the Republican opponents of Democratic incumbents who tried to focus on ISIS and Ebola in the scariest, most non-factual ways to take the, you know, the eye off the real, the real issues, which were the economy.”

 

CNN’s Costello Plays Up GOP’s ‘Campaign of Fear’ in Midterms

 

CNN’s Carol Costello hyped how “Republicans have managed to use fear so successfully in these midterm elections” during interviews of two former governors on Tuesday’s CNN Newsroom. Costello contended that “Republicans may be on the verge of winning Senate control – thanks, in large part, to a campaign of fear. If you examine the political ads that many Republican candidates have put out, they don’t extol ideas – but Democrats say they do exploit fear.”

 

ABC Insists ‘The Republican Brand Is Still Very Damaged’

 

Despite the Republican Party taking control of both houses of Congress as well as winning additional governors races, ABC’s Good Morning America made sure to throw some cold water on the GOP victory. On Wednesday morning, co-host George Stephanopoulos and ABC News Political Analyst Matthew Dowd pushed the line that despite the GOP’s midterm victory “the Republican brand is still very damaged.”

 

Chuck Todd Denies GOP Wave Election, Then Changes His Mind

 

During NBC News’s 10:00 p.m. Eastern midterms elections coverage, NBC News political director and Meet the Press moderator Chuck Todd emphasized that the 2014 midterms were not a Republican wave, but changed his mind within the hour to stating the possibility that it may indeed be a GOP wave. At 10:04 p.m., Todd told Brian Williams in response to his request to walk through “how the Republican plot line” for the evening has unfolded thus far: “What I would say is that everybody is holding serve. Ok? It’s a good Republican night, but it’s not a wave.” Then, at 10:49 p.m., Todd said this about the current state of affairs of the midterm elections: “I think we’re bordering on calling this a wave election. You have an historic number in the House of Representatives.”

 

Politico’s VandeHei: GOP In ‘Hell of A Jam’ If They Win Senate

 

Appearing on MSNBC’s Morning Joe Tuesday morning, Politico’s Jim VandeHei absurdly claimed that Republicans would be in big trouble if they took control of the Senate in the midterm election: “…even if Republicans win, I think they’re going to be in a hell of a jam. In that they’re not going to be able to get anything done.” VandeHei predicted Senators like Ted Cruz would be “breathing fire” and that “ultraconservatives” would control the party: “… and it’s what’s gonna make governing almost impossible over the next two years. This happy talk that things can get done is nonsense if you look at the history of the last four years in terms of how these House Republicans want to vote and what the base of the Republican Party responds to.”

 

Liberal CNN Analyst Laments ‘Best Campaigner’ Dems Have in Obama ‘Locked Away in the WH’

 

Early Wednesday morning, liberal CNN political commentator Cornell Belcher groaned during CNN’s midterms elections coverage that the Democratic Party’s top campaigner in President Barack Obama was unable to defend attacks against his record and help Democrats on the campaign trailer because he “was basically locked away in the White House.” During a panel discussion about how the election results panned out and how it all went wrong for the Democrats, Belcher complained: “The problem for the White House has been this – arguably the best campaigner our party has was basically locked away in the White House and, in fact, when they were leading attacks against the President, the President was never able to really come out of the White House and defend himself[.]”

Media BiASS: More of the Same…No News…

Chris Matthews, Guest Mangle Boko Haram Issue Into Racial Jab at GOP

Chris Matthews mocked Republicans on Friday’s Hardball over their hawkish stance towards Boko Haram, the Nigerian Islamist group that recently kidnapped hundreds of girls. Matthews made a thinly-veiled racial attack on the GOP during a panel discussion on the terrorist organization: “By the way, when did the Republican Party take this keen interest in Africa? I may have missed that one.” Guest Michelle Bernard, who is of Jamaican decent, quickly followed the MSNBC host with a more overt racially-based jab at Republicans: “I was about to say. It was very nice to see all these – all these conservatives – you know, beating the battle drum for justice for people who look like me.”

Benghazi Watch for Friday: NBC Skips New Investigation; ABC Offers 12 seconds

The House on Thursday voted to create a select committee to investigate Benghazi, but NBC’s Today, a four hour program, on Friday totally ignored the story. In contrast, the show spent two minutes on the topic of how many times a week people should shower. ABC’s Good Morning America allowed a mere 12 seconds for the latest details. News reader Amy Robach emphasized, Republicans on Capitol Hill are opening an eighth investigation into the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi.” She added, “Today, Democrats are meeting to decide whether to boycott the new investigation, calling it election year politics.” CBS This Morning offered a scant 15 seconds. Co-host Charlie Rose quickly derided, “Thursday’s vote to create the committee stayed mostly along party lines with 225 Republicans voting in favor. Only seven Democrats backed the probe.” On Thursday, CBS’s Nancy Cordes featured Democrats such as Congressman Gerry Connolly complaining, “For political reasons, to keep the base fired up between now and the midterm elections.”

On CBS, Michael Smerconish Slams Talk Radio’s ‘Horrific Impact on Polarization and Incivility’

Appearing on Friday’s CBS This Morning, Sirius XM radio and CNN host Michael Smerconish hocked his new fictional novel about the talk radio business entitled Talk, and denounced the industry: “I think it’s entertainment masked as news and I wanted to expose it because I think it’s had a horrific impact on polarization and incivility in the country.”  Smerconish was teed up by co-host Gayle King, who described the book as “the story of an influential conservative radio personality at a crossroad against the backdrop of a presidential race,” before proclaiming: “…many times when I used to listen to talk radio, it’s hard to do now, I used to listen to these guys, Michael, and say, ‘They can’t possibly believe what they’re saying.’ And after reading your book…the character says it’s all for show. Half the time they don’t mean what they’re saying. It just is a way to just rile up the crowd.”

On The Kelly File: Donate to a Non-Profit Conservative Group and Your Odds of Being Audited Go Up Tenfold

On Thursday’s edition of The Kelly File, host Megyn Kelly invited on attorney Cleta Mitchell, who represents groups targeted by the IRS, to talk about a new House Republican report that found ten percent of Tea Party donors were audited by the IRS, compared to just one percent for ordinary taxpayers. So far ABC, CBS and NBC have failed to cover the new report.

Packed! Erroneous? RINOs! LIEberals! Obamacare!

More Court Packing

Once again, Senate Democrats took advantage of having “gone nuclear” and ending the filibuster for judicial nominees. In the dark of night Thursday, the Senate confirmed Cornelia Pillard to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals by a vote of 51-44. That makes two additional Obama nominees on the court with the lightest workload, and it gives leftists a 6-4 advantage on the court that hears most challenges to executive actions. On top of that, National Review’s Patrick Brennan calls Pillard “probably the most extreme of President Obama’s judicial nominees this year.” Why? Well, for example, Brennan says she opposed a church’s right to be exempt from normal employment-discrimination law in order to decide on a minister. The Supreme Court disagreed with her, 9-0. Beware…

Comment

_____

Erroneous? How can that be? Someone had to write the code to enable this to happen. SOmeone had to ask that such be possible? Erroneous?

How about blatant stealing!! Endorsed by those in a position to make it happen!

Erroneous my ass!!

Reports of erroneous WA health exchange debits

______

War? because the ‘established’ RINOs want everything their way? And no other need apply? Bull!! No better then the DemocRATS dictating and controlling their party!!

Well I am a Conservative and I see nothing in either party worth supporting!! I will not support candidates whom do not support the Constitution and my Rights!!

RINOs…Is hunting season…

The Republican establishment and insurgent groups brace for all-out war

______

And speaking of not supporting our Rights, the LIEberals are blatantly trying to take them away and silence all those whom speak out and oppose them…

Screw that..

Liberals take aim at freedom of speech and religion

_____

Supported it did you?

Now live with it.

Or make it go away…

I have no sympathy or time for you!

New York’s Cultural Elite Blindsided By ObamaCare

_______

Media BiASS: Tortured Football Analogy: Ed Schultz Compares Obama to Auburn; Republicans are Alabam

Tortured Football Analogy: Ed Schultz Compares Obama to Auburn; Republicans are Alabama

Perhaps the White House told Ed Schultz to compare the administration to a powerhouse football team? On Monday’s MSNBC program, the liberal host offered a most tortured analogy: Barack Obama is just like the University of Auburn’s football team and the Republicans are the defeated Alabama. Schultz even replayed Saturday’s exciting final play, swapping out Chris Davis for the President: “Holy smokes, we’ve got a return by ObamaCare! This is Chris Davis. He’s a believer! He’s got all those Obama blockers out there!” Screaming as he narrated the game’s final seconds, Schultz continued with his fantasy interpretation: “It’s going to work! It’s going to work! Look at ObamaCare! It’s going to work! They ain’t giving up. One hundred and nine yards in Jordan Harris stadium!” Considering his disdain for conservatives, the host leveled his harshest comparison at Alabama: “Even the arrogance of Alabama, who thinks they can beat everybody anywhere, any time, any day, even with one second left, they think they’re going to get it to you. And that’s where they’re just like the Republicans!”

NBC’s Gregory Cuts Off GOP Congressman to Spew ObamaCare Propaganda

On Sunday’s Meet the Press, as Republican Congressman Mike Rogers denounced ObamaCare’s “unprecedented confiscation of people’s health care,” moderator David Gregory interrupted to parrot White House talking points defending the disastrous policy: “…you talk about confiscation, the reality is there’s also a lot of people who are going to have the potential to get insurance who never had insurance. And you have a small piece of the market where people may lose plans. Many of those will get better plans in the individual market.”  Rogers attempted to push back against Gregory’s assertions: “But David, that’s not true. David – a hundred million people [may lose their insurance].” Gregory just kept talking over the Congressman, citing a poll that 54% of Americans think the ObamaCare problems will be solved and concluding: “That’s a level of credibility and belief in the system that presumably is very important.”

CNN Pundit Shrugs Off Obama’s Lie: ‘Every President Is Going to Lie to You’

On CNN Sunday evening, liberal ESPN columnist LZ Granderson justified the President’s repeated lie about ObamaCare, claiming that Americans knew he did it for their own good. “And, time and time again, Americans have said we can deal with the lies that President Obama tells us because we believe in his heart, he has the best interest for the American people,” Granderson insisted.

MSNBC’s Hayes: ‘Republicans Sabotaged Healthcare.Gov’

On Wednesday’s All In on MSNBC, during a discussion of how to deal with conversing with conservative relative during Thanksgiving dinner, host Chris Hayes at one point seemed to claim that Republicans “sabotaged” the ObamaCare Web site, Healthcare.Gov. CBS contributor Nancy Giles also complained that she “hates” it when people who “hate government” get into power and then “dismantle” government.

Attkisson: Fast and Furious Whistleblower ‘Rare Example’ Amidst Obama’s ‘War On Leaks’

Sharyl Attkisson touted ‘Fast and Furious’ whistleblower John Dodson as “a rare example, especially amid the Obama administration’s war on leaks” during a segment on Monday’s CBS This Morning. Attkisson, whose reporting on the arms trafficking scandal won CBS a Edward R. Murrow Award, spotlighted the ATF senior agent’s new book on “the inside story of why he went public to expose the government’s false denials about its gunwalking secrets.” The correspondent also pointed out how “there’s still a court battle over the ‘Fast and Furious’ documents that President Obama is withholding from Congress under executive privilege.” She also featured a clip from Dodson where he emphasized that this is an ongoing controversy that deserves more media attention.

Global Warming Alarmist Sam Champion Leaves ABC for Weather Channel: His Top 5 Most Unbelievable Quotes

ABC announced on Monday that weatherman and global warming alarmist Sam Champion will be leaving the network for the Weather Channel. Champion has developed a long history of the most hyperbolic predictions about climate change. Additionally, the ABC personality has promoted bizarre environmentalists such as No Impact Man, an activist who shunned toilet paper. On February 8, 2008, Champion ridiculously asked Good Morning America viewers, “Could global warming one day force us into space to live?” On June 25, 2007, the weatherman promoted Colin Beavan, the anti-toilet paper No Impact Man. When his ABC colleagues expressed skepticism, Champion reassured Chris Cuomo that the host could keep “your toilet paper,” but didn’t mention the rest of the country. Here are the five most obnoxious examples of Sam Champion’s environmental extremism: