Stop AG Keith Ellison’s Magazine Ban!

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison has filed an amicus curiae brief in the United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals calling for the court to uphold California’s absolute ban on rifle and pistol magazines that hold more than ten rounds and permit states to pass other unspecified gun control measures – claiming that such measures do not infringe upon the Second Amendment.

If this law is upheld, Californians will have to turn in or destroy magazines that hold more than ten rounds.

Keith Ellison is arguing that Minnesota should be able to do the same!

You can read the amicus curiae brief at this link. The case is Duncan v. Becerra.

This could be a dangerous precedent if the court agrees with Keith Ellison – allowing states and other government bodies to pass extreme gun control laws – and have them upheld by the courts.

TELL MN ATTORNEY GENERAL KEITH ELLISON TO REMOVE MINNESOTA FROM THIS AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF

We need to POUR ON THE PRESSURE TODAY in order to get Ellison to REMOVE MINNESOTA from this ridiculous brief.

Visit our Action Center TODAY!

 

Advertisements

Gun Bits …

Mexico’s Gun Control Works So Well 3,000 People Killed In June Alone

But, but…Gun Control!!

~

Legislating “Gun Safety”

Is pointless without addressing the real problem…People whom break the law, over and over….

~

Convicted Killer Blames Guns And Hollywood For His Actions, Not Poor Judgement..

Sure…

~

‘Avengers’ Director Joss Whedon Donates $245K to Anti-Gun SuperPAC

Hollywood hypocrisy…

Because no guns or violence in his movies!!

~

Good Advice On CCW…

So You Want to Carry Concealed: Five Mistakes to Avoid

Assume that first holster is going to work perfectly, always.

Umm pretty much, have a drawer full before settling on a Remora IWB and a Galco Matrix for OWB..

Forget you’re wearing a gun.

Like how???

Talk to “everybody” about it.

Stupid, stupid, stupid to do so…

Carry only when it’s convenient.

Way back when I took my first permit to carry class the Instructor stated ‘Do not carry only when you feel you need to, practice and carry whenever you can(All the time!), you need to be comfortable having a gun on you.’

Also I have learned in my many years of EMS, shit happens and can happen anytime, any place…

 

Vox Wants to Take Your Guns ….

Vox Wants to Take Your Guns

Who  the hell is this Vox and is he stupid??

German Lopez, writing for Vox, pulled back the curtain in a manic fit of rage this week. Lopez’s article includes the sub-heading “There should be a Medicare-for-All or Green New Deal for ending gun violence.

Without getting into the theatrical politics of wish-lists and all-encompassing big government programs, neither proposal has advanced past the fantasy stage. We’re a single-issue organization, so let’s see what Lopez wants to see. He wants fewer guns, and he wants to add “significant barriers for even a would-be gun owner who has no ill intent or bad history.”

“A better, more immediate goal, then is to make it harder for literally anyone to buy a firearm and reduce the number of guns not just over time but right now.”

“But in a country that already has so many firearms, something also needs to be done to take out a lot of guns more quickly.”

Quickly would mean violently, with many men carrying guns to do so…

Is this clown ready for that? Does he think everyone would comply and submit?

~

 

Yep! That Works!!

Let’s pass another gun law the Democrats say!!
Because that’ll solve our raging ‘gun’ problem!!

And show the mindless sheeple that are so afraid of guns we are doing something!!!

Brace Yourselves, Gun Owners: Dems Introduced A New Gun Control Bill

And introduced by the usual, corrupt DemocRATs!!

he Help Empower Americans to Respond (HEAR) Act is being introduced by Democratic Sens. Bob Menendez (NJ), Dianne Feinstein (CA), Richard Blumenthal (CA) and Tim Kaine (VA).

 

Anti-gun spending bill is Chuck Schumer’s dream….

Gun Owners of America

Democrats Insert Gun Control into Government Spending Bill

Anti-gun Democrats are at it again, trying to sneak gun control into must-pass spending bills.

And it is clear that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her Democrats are playing “hardball,” while the GOP often plays “cotton ball.”

Here’s the issue: The House is getting ready to take up its version of the money bill for the Department of Justice, plus the science agencies and the Commerce Department (H.R. 3055).

And Democrats are loading the bill with all kinds of anti-gun riders.

When Republicans were in charge, they repeatedly accepted anti-gun Commerce-Justice-Science (CJS) riders like the Schumer amendment. This amendment would make it impossible for federal minor white-collar offenders to ever get their gun rights back.

In exchange for the Schumer amendment, Democrats would make minor pro-gun concessions like prohibiting Obama from arming Mexican drug cartels (the Fast & Furious amendment) — or conceding that imported shotguns might have a “sporting purpose.”

Well, now the Democrats are in control of the House. And the Schumer amendment is still there.

But gone are the pro-gun “Quid Pro Quos” which Republicans had gotten in exchange for Schumer when they were in charge.

Gone is the amendment which would prohibit the government from blocking certain shotguns from being imported.

Gone is the amendment prohibiting the government from coercing banks and credit card companies to bankrupt gun dealers and manufacturers by cutting off credit and banking services — the “Operation Choke Point” amendment.

Gone is the amendment prohibiting the administrative implementation of the UN arms trade treaty — with its gun bans and forced registration — all without Senate ratification.

Gone is the amendment ensuring that curios and relics can continue to be imported into the US.

And gone is the “Fast & Furious” amendment which would prohibit the ATF from arming Mexican drug cartels.

During the Fast & Furious scandal, federal officials funneled firearms to known criminals, so the Obama administration could then use the subsequent body count in Mexico to push for additional gun control here in the U.S.

Rather than prohibiting programs like Fast and Furious, the bill has some weasel words in Section 215 which allows the ATF to conduct a similar program.

ATF could run a “reloaded” version of Fast & Furious so long as they sit on their hands, rather than “facilitating” the firearms transfers. And, so long as they can claim they’re “continuously monitoring” the firearms, however erroneous that may be.

So for those who want to further restrict the civilian ownership of firearms — and for those in Mexican drug cartels — the Democrat’s CJS appropriations bill is definitely their “ticket.”

For all others, we are demanding a vote against final passage.

By the way, I should mention that ATF’s budget of $1.439 billion in this bill would represent an increase of $122 million over last year and over $70 million above what ATF asked for.

And no less than $27.5 million would go to disarm veterans under the Veterans Disarmament Act of 2007 and the Fix NICS provision (from 2018). As you may remember, these two laws now have a major pot of money set aside to take away guns from law-abiding veterans, simply based on a psychiatrists’ diagnosis.

Please take action by emailing your Representative and Senators in opposition to H.R. 3055.

And if you have time to follow it up with a phone call, please contact them at 202-224-3121.