Probably Not…

So far the GOP has down nothing to stop the onslaught of gun control fanatics.

They had the opportunity..But dropped the ball big time.

The GOP has proven themselves to be filled with RINOs or spineless twits..(I know, same difference!)

So with the DemocRATs taking over the House..

I expect things to get worse for us..

Example: 1st Amendment is being gutted by Leftist media and their Social Media cohorts…

What has the GOP done so far to defend the 1st?

Will the GOP Senate Have the Will to Stop the House Democrat’s Gun Control..

Morning Miscellany ………………..

Could it happen again?


As I would tell any doctor..

Whom asked me about guns..

None of your damn business..


Remember the 1st Amendment?

Apparently the IRS and Atheists do not..


One can hope..

Reid charged in bribery case..


Apparently you right wing extremists..

Whom believe in Liberty, smaller government and individual Rights..

Are a growing threat..

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center..

And need to be dealt with..


Bloomberg and his front group, Mothers Demand Action..

Making Targets of innocent victims through disarmament..


Doctor whom ‘violated’ gun free hospital zone and saved lives by shooting assailant..

Is in trouble of course.

Because it was a gun free zone!!

And that always stop s an attacker..


 Anti Hunting groups and ‘rewilding’…

This is damn stupid..


 Unarmed and defenseless in San Diego..

Because you know, the Sheriff will protect you!

At least your dead or maimed body..


A would be tyrant…


Hey plastic face!!

Take your crap elsewhere…

Your old and ugly..Irrelevant..

No one cares..


This Home Owners Association needs to be drug into the street and horse whipped..



Miscellany ………..

Pregnancy a disease?

According to ObamaScare!

That somewhat contradicts this verse!

28 And God blessed them. And God said to them, “Be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth and subdue it, and have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over every living thing that moves on the earth.” 


Probably a DemocRAT...


What 1st Amendment?

No free speech for you!

And Obama says..

You don’t deserve to be Free!


Who really owns America?

The government seems to think it does..

But dammit when will the Sheeple wake up and realize the Government owns nothing..

Everything they have comes from their Taxation of the People…

So we own it..

But don’t seem to realize or want to!!

Is the Government backing down?

Or is it a set up?


The Lord told us to go forth and

Interesting article about George Bush, Obama’s predecessor, and how smart he was.

By a Stanford Professor…

For real..


Add five words to the 2nd Amendment?

I don’t think so..


10 questions to ask your favorite LIEberal..

Or least favorite..


The Bundy Affair Is the Tip of the Iceberg To What’s Coming


 ATF to monitor Gun Owners with Drones: Attorney General confirms ATF to buy Fleet of Domestic Drones



MNsure! Voice!!


KSTP reporters learned that the MNSure website is one of 58% of state-run “Obamacare” exchanges that are vulnerable to a Wi-Fi cyber attack.

Rep. Kathy Lohmer (39B) – Legislative Update 
Dear Neighbor,
On Wednesday, MNsure – the Minnesota arm of Obamacare – held a board meeting to review the status of its enrollment process. We discovered that after one month into MNsure’s failed launch, zero Minnesotans have completed enrollment in a health plan. Because MNsure officials are unable to transfer application information into health plans – the critical last step of the enrollment process – a person cannot be completely enrolled in a health plan. After spending $150 million taxpayer dollars on this government-organized bureaucracy, Minnesotans should truly expect better of their government.
Additionally, you can expect to pay a brand new tax on your health insurance plans. The unelected board of directors for MNsure voted to impose a 1.5% tax on your health insurance. Revenue from this tax will be held in a special account to be used by MNsure to cover operation costs, with few limitations, in later years. Minnesota taxpayers can’t afford to pay even more for the implementation of Obamacare by Governor Dayton and Democrats. Even worse, it’s not only MNsure enrollees who are seeing their costs go up. It has beenreported that as many as 1 in 20 Minnesotans (280,000) will be forced to give up policies they like, with doctors of their choosing, for policies that will be more expensive and involve services they do not want.
Meanwhile, the legislative auditor issued his review of the MNsure privacy breach that occurred back in September when an employee released the social security numbers of over 1500 Minnesotans. The legislative auditor concluded that this was not an isolated incident, but a top-to-bottom problem for MNsure as it relates to properly training employees and instituting safeguards of the personal information of Minnesotans. It’s time for this trend of data breaches to end. 


IRS the new weapon against your free speech

Now they’re coming after your political voice!

At National Right to Life, we are ever on the guard against regulations that would take away the free speech rights of groups like NRLC who speak up for the unborn.

We have to be.  Attacking our free speech rights has long been a favorite tactic of pro-abortion policymakers as a way to undermine public support for the unborn.

Now, proposed new regulations by Barack Obama’s Internal Revenue Service would dramatically limit the rights of advocacy organizations like NRLC to inform the public about the positions of candidates, how members of Congress voted, what statements they made about issues, etc.  Limits would even be imposed on our right to discuss the positions of nominees for federal judgeships, including those nominated to the U.S. Supreme Court!

If you are a member of the National Right to Life Committee – if you believe in and support our right to inform voters of these facts before an election – these new regulations would mean that not just our rights, but your rights to free speech and association would be severely violated.

The Obama team sees organizations like National Right to Life as a threat.  They see you and your views as a threat.  They want to muzzle those views.  It’s that simple.

Free speech is a birthright of the American people and has been for more than 200 years.  It is not a commodity any American president or administration, who hold office for just a few short years, can take away for crass political reasons.

Please help us fight this threat to our free speech and to the unborn.  We need to raise a storm of public protest against these regulations, to make it as hard as possible for the IRS to give final approval.  We need to educate the American people that it seems every group that opposes Obama’s policies is now under threat of having their most fundamental rights taken away.

Can you help us fight this scourge, and help protect the voice of the unborn with a generous donation of $500 or $250 today?  The IRS has already been implicated in over-zealously investigating pro-life organizations – the use of the IRS as a political weapon has to stop!

If the amounts above are too much, I completely understand, and hope you can support us with a needed gift of $100, $50 or $35.  Together we’ll stand to defend our free speech rights . . . and the rights of the unborn who have no other voice but us!

For an excellent short summary of this new threat from the IRS, see The Latest IRS Power Grab, by former Federal Elections Commission Chair Bradley Smith, which you can read here.


Defund! Stop! UN Arms Treaty! Surprise? Free Speech? Baby Murderers! Dumb Quotes!!

Defund ObamaCare!

As we explained in this recent alert, time is running out on efforts to stop ObamaCare. On October 1, 2013, open enrollment begins for the law’s massive new entitlements, including the new subsidized exchanges and Medicaid expansion. Once those kick in, it will be nearly impossible to undo ObamaCare. Senators Ted Cruz and Mike Lee are leading an effort to defund ObamaCare in the Senate.


Stop Amnesty!

As this article explains, the Senate Gang of Eight amnesty bill is unconstitutional, but any House bills dealing with amnesty could validate it. Harry Reid is refusing to send the bill to the House of Representatives, because he knows it will be “blue slipped,” or invalidated because it is unconstitutional.


UN should be removed from NY and no longer funded by the USA…

Top 10 Reasons Why the U.S. Should Not Sign the U.N. Arms Trade Treaty

The top 10 reasons why the U.S. should avoid putting itself in this dangerous position by not signing the ATT are:

  1. A broken red line. In October 2009, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated that the U.S. supported negotiation of the ATT only by “the rule of consensus decision-making.”[1] In the U.N., “consensus” means “unanimity.” But after negotiations failed to achieve consensus, the ATT was adopted with U.S. support in April 2013 by a majority vote in the U.N. General Assembly. The U.S. thus broke its own red line. To protect its national interests, the U.S. often participates in negotiations only if they are conducted on the basis of consensus. The U.S.-backed turn to the majority-rule General Assembly reinforces a damaging precedent that will be cited in the future against the U.S.

  2. A rushed and short-circuited review. The treaty became available on April 2. On April 5, Assistant Secretary of State Thomas Countryman stated that the U.S. review process for it would take “months, at a minimum.”[2] But on May 15, a mere six weeks later, while that review was ongoing, he announced that the U.S. would sign the ATT. Thus, the U.S. review was extremely rapid and effectively

    cut short

    before it was concluded.

  3. An “ambiguous” treaty. On April 5, Countryman rightly described the ATT as “ambiguous.” The treaty defines none of its terms or defines them only by reference to other undefined terms. The treaty is a

    conveyor belt

    that will pull along its signatories—including, potentially, the U.S.—as the meanings of its terms are defined.

  4. Amendments by majority rule. The treaty can be amended by a three-quarters majority vote. These amendments are binding only on nations that accept them, but the amended treaty will be used to pressure the U.S. to comply in practice with amendments it refused to accept in principle. This makes the ambiguity of the treaty more dangerous.

  5. Bad for the U.S. arms export process. This process is governed by Presidential Decision Directive 34, issued by President Bill Clinton in 1995. The essence of the U.S. process is that it considers a broad range of criteria as a whole. The treaty, on the other hand, contains many prohibitions and assessment criteria that make it more akin to a checklist that must be met item by item. Over time, this checklist will become only more restrictive, further hampering the conduct of U.S. foreign policy.

  6. Bad for the Second Amendment. The treaty does not exclude lawfully owned civilian firearms and contains only a weak preambular reference to civilian ownership. It creates a “responsibility” to prevent the “diversion” of firearms to the illicit trade, sets out national record-keeping on the identity of end users—i.e., individual owners—of imported firearms as a best practice, and offers justifications for imposing new administrative burdens on significant firearms imports into and exports out of the U.S. market. As the treaty is interpreted and amended, both the U.N. agencies that explicitly promote gun control and the many nations that wanted the ATT to impose even tighter domestic restrictions will pull and pressure the U.S. toward imposing further regulations.

  7. Bad for the Reagan Doctrine. The treaty raises significant legal barriers against arming the opponents of totalitarian regimes. This practice is known as the Reagan Doctrine, but it has been a bipartisan instrument of U.S. foreign policy since 1945. Since the treaty will not, in practice, prevent totalitarian regimes from arming terrorists and other dictators, it offers the U.S. nothing except tighter controls on the world’s democracies.

  8. Bad for export control reform. The current U.S. system of export controls is responsible but also baroquely complex. Reforms are under way to improve the U.S. system. These reforms would place tighter controls on fewer items, especially sensitive ones. But the campaign for the ATT seeks to expand the number of items covered by the treaty both through the treaty’s amendment procedure and by taking advantage of its ambiguity. The conflict between these aims can be postponed but not evaded, and the clash between them is not likely to be good for the U.S. system.

  9. Bad for U.S. sovereignty. The standards at the heart of the ATT—which are based on international humanitarian law, international human rights law, and a knowledge test—are vague and readily subject to redefinition. The treaty as a whole is, as its supporters openly acknowledge, intended to create international norms that will restrain the conduct of the U.S. both by shaping the operation of the policy process and by establishing a pretended customary international law standard that will influence the deliberations of U.S. courts. This is bad for the ability of the U.S. to govern itself under the Constitution.

  10. It will not work. The ATT nominally seeks to control the illicit international trade in arms. This makes as much sense as trying to control crime by outlawing it. Terrorists and dictators around the world are regularly armed directly by, or with the tacit acquiescence of, members of the U.N., frequently in violation of U.N. Security Council arms embargoes. The treaty was negotiated by the same nations that are responsible for these violations. Another serious problem is that many nations are unable or unwilling to control their own borders, secure their own stockpiles, or even keep members of their armed forces and police departments from selling their firearms. The treaty will not transform these incompetent nations into well-governed and law-abiding ones.


Not sure what to think of this…

Amnesty Surprise & 20 Million New Gun Owners ~ Bienvenida A Mis Amigos


Free Speech? 1st Amendment? Only applies to whom Government thugs and LIEberals think it should…Them!!

New Mexico county considers picketing ban after pro-life protests


Ahhh…SOmeone disagreed with the Baby Murderers and of course they respond with a fit…

Viral BuzzFeed post on ‘outrageous’ Planned Parenthood sparks fury among pro-aborts


The dumb is strong here…Amongst the LIEberals…Scary strong it is!!

Video: 50 Dumbest Democrat Quotes


This is Wrong and Has…

Fail written all over it!!


One more reason to avoid Kalifornistan!!

What do they not understand about Freedom of Religion and the Constitution?

Why do we always have to defend everything we do? Especially since England was fled because of religious persecution?

We have no place left to run.

So therefore it is time to stand up for our rights and remember..the 2nd Amendment is there to protect our Rights!! And Freedom!!